|
Time has passed from the days when the law on computer crime included only
traditional crimes committed using a computer as a tool. Drafting information
technology law, be it the law on electronic transactions, electronic signatures
or electronic funds transfer, is a matter of great complexity, filled with dilemma
and surrounded by a plethora of obstacles. The rapid development of computer
technology has triggered a variety of ingenious new criminal behaviours, and an
explosion in specialized legislation doing its best to catch up with them. Despite
these most valiant efforts to protect our citizens from these nefarious goings-on,
the culprits are, more often than not, more than one step ahead, and are usually
able to leap nimbly through the loopholes. The sheer diversity and magnitude of
losses directly caused by computers seems impossible to predict or prevent.
The advent of viruses, tiny pieces of computer code which replicate and spread
rapidly through a computer system or entire network, is an unprecedented
phenomenon that law is not equipped to handle. Policymakers, scholars and
computer experts have proposed many deterrence strategies, from criminal
sanctions to tort law, even targeting the web designers themselves, but none of these
methods has proved successful at deterring criminal virus-makers and hackers.
Whilst the problem has spawned a major industry in complicated anti-virus,
anti-spyware software and electronic ‘firewalls’, the detection of crimes and
offenders still appears increasingly difficult. And even if the crime is successfully
detected, detection usually is to no avail due to the problems encountered in
collecting evidential proof.
Indeed, no technician knows every piece, part and function of a computer and
software, given the hugeness and complexity of the whole system. Different pieces
and parts need to be handled by different skillful hands. Thus, nobody can really
master a computer. A technical error may result in such inestimable losses, chaos
and confusion as to be disastrous to mankind.
The crucial component of a computer is a tiny-sized
silicon chip. We seldom think about this, but the greater
the speed and efficiency possessed by a chip, the greater
the pollution it generates. Research has revealed that this
complexity means in effect that a computer chip can
destroy the environment to a larger extent than a car
could. This is because silicon chips manufactured to a
minute size actually produce a vast amount of refuse
during the course of their manufacture. The production
of a chip of 2 grams in weight requires fossil energy
of about 1,400 grams, which is 700 times the weight
of the chip itself.
A study has recently been undertaken by researchers,
who analyzed all raw materials and fossil energy used in
converting raw quartz into a 32 MB RAM chip. The study
revealed that the manufacturing process consumed many
times more materials and energy than that consumed in
the manufacture of other electronic products.
So- we are faced with an uncomfortable truth- the production
of microchips is therefore unsafe to the environment,
and will eventually lead to unimaginable environmental
destruction.
Let us look ahead a little way. In the computer age, we
may imagine that civilizations may even be encapsulated
in a single tiny chip. In the event of a technical error, loss
or misinterpretation, such abridged civilizations will
merely come to an abrupt end. The more complex the
production becomes, the greater the risk to man. Thus, we
begin to envision the supernatural and borderless power of
the computer. Mere “inability to please it” may lead to the
termination of our civilizations and lives in a wink!
In the dearth of law delineating or restricting such
paranormal power of the computer, I recalled an old film
entitled “The (666) Omen” starring Gregory Peck. The
movie featured the symbol of the terminator of the earth
– the number 666. Central to the theme was the passage
in the Holy Bible, which predicts:
“Here is wisdom. Let him
who has understanding
calculate the number of the beast,
for it is the number of a man;
his number is 666.”
(Book of Revelations, Chapter 13 : Verse 18)
In The Omen, the symbol 666 appeared on a little child
and caused a catalogue of tragedies, which even our
esteemed hero was incapable of preventing.
Finally (and conspiracy theorists please take note), consider
this strange and slightly sinister surprise. In the word
“computer”, each letter can be translated into a numerical
value in accordance with its alphabetical order, as follows:
Then, when multiplying each number by 6, the following outputs are derived.
When all these outputs are summed, we will have… = 6 6 6
Amen!!! • |
|
|
|