|
Had Saddam Hussein escaped the executioner’s noose and
been released back into Baghdad, I very much doubt he
would have been able to find his way home.
Those who thrived under his brutal regime and the
masses who grovelled in fear and poverty are busy tearing
each other to pieces. The invading forces have installed
so many concrete blast walls and kilometres of razor wire
to protect themselves from the suicide bombers that
Saddam’s journey back to his palace would now have
become a circuitous and never-ending series of one-way
systems, blocked roads and checkpoints.
The once ordered and smoothly functioning city has
disintegrated like the rest of the country into an utter
disaster. Military force has ravaged the infrastructure.
Poorly conceived or non-existent plans allowed the police
and military to be disbanded, leaving Iraq’s porous borders
open and unguarded. Every foreign fighter who was so
inclined was able to stream across and join the jihad.
Saddam’s murderous rule benefited few; his removal was
hailed as a new opportunity for Iraq to move towards
democracy and a better quality of life for the majority.
Such propaganda meant that on arrival in the slums
of Sadr City, the huge sprawling Shia neighbourhood
in Baghdad, the US troops were greeted with cheers
and smiles. They were saviours who would bring
freedom, clean water, electricity and jobs to these
downtrodden people.
By December 2003 the frenzy of looting that followed the
fall of Baghdad had subsided. A calmness hovered over the
city, shattered, however, with increasing frequency by an
escalating campaign of car bombs and mortar attacks. The
people were angry and were fighting back. The dissatisfied
fell into several groups. The Sunnis were unhappy at
having their position of power and privilege taken away.
The Shiites and Kurds alike, always the underdogs under
Saddam, were not getting what they wanted fast enough.
And outside influences, long jealous of Iraq’s wealth
and status in the region, quickly moved in to supply
weapons to insurgent and militia groups, contributing
to further destabilization. Al-Qaeda, whose principal aim
is to drive Americans and American influence out of
Muslim lands, quickly assembled a powerful and deadly
force within Iraq.
Month by month, since my first arrival in Iraq, I have
witnessed changes for the worse in the quality of life for
Iraqis. The dangers under which they have to live make it
increasingly difficult for journalists to get a clear picture
of daily life in Iraq. In the winter of 2003 it was still
possible for a foreigner to walk in a Baghdad market or
eat in a restaurant. As journalists we could speak freely
with people on the streets and travel throughout the
country. Our main fear at that time was simple banditry;
carjacking was popular and kidnapping was beginning
to make an appearance.
By April 2004 a Shia uprising had gripped Sadr city in
Baghdad and Najaf in the south. Planeloads of journalists
and photographers left the country since our immunity as
observers and reporters had been stripped. Contractors
were kidnapped and beheaded or killed by roadside bombs
as their convoys passed by. Everything about being there
became increasingly difficult. Local people could not
understand how this mission was going so badly wrong -
in fact, neither could the Americans. Soldiers who were
having flowers tossed at them less than 12 months earlier
were now getting pelted with stones. That was on the good
days; on the bad days they were putting parts of their
friends into body bags after yet another bomb attack.
By the end of the year it was clear that the country
had entered a violent downward spiral. Moving outside
Baghdad by road was virtually impossible - even within
the city limits, extreme caution was needed. Many
media organisations hired armed guards and purchased
armoured vehicles to keep their correspondents alive.
Freelancers had to make do with battered taxis and
hoped to slip under the radar. No journalists lived in
private houses any longer: now they hunkered together
in two run-down hotel complexes, the Palestine and
the Al-Hamra, outside the “safe haven” known as the
Green Zone.
In 2005 even these ‘safe havens’ from which to scurry
and gather some news came under attack. Both were hit
by multiple suicide bombs within a month of each other.
I was asleep in the Al-Hamra when my windows exploded
into the room as a 200 kilo car bomb smashed into
the security wall and detonated; moments later it was
followed by another bigger explosion, 500 kilos this time.
The blast ripped the window frames from the walls, the
ceilings in the hallway collapsed and the doors were torn
from their hinges.
At last I felt as though I truly appreciated what the Iraqis
go through everyday on their way to work or school. The
feeling of insecurity is complete and all-pervading.
As the suicide bombers and death squads go about their
ethnic cleansing and the forces of the shrinking coalition
admit that they cannot even control the capital, let alone
the rest of the country, what hope is there for Iraq? Will it
become another Somalia? Is Iraq destined for nothing
more than decades of death, destruction and misery?
Other countries around the world are experiencing the
fallout from the calamitous action taken in Iraq by
the coalition forces. There have been bombings in London
and Madrid. Bali was stunned by a vicious bombing,
and Thailand’s Muslim insurgency in its southernmost
provinces is taking on a different and more complex
countenance.
As the world moves forward technologically, so it seems
to be regressing in terms of racial and religious tolerance.
The actions of the new empire builders are radicalizing
many more everyday. Those who were once happy to keep
their heads down and go about their business are now
prepared to die making a statement in defence of their
culture and religion.
I feel very fortunate to have been able to travel to such
flashpoints as Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon and Colombia,
and to have recorded first-hand the impact of conflicts
on both the local people and those fighting on all sides.
It can be depressing to witness the repetitious cycles of
violence that countries and regions go through. It can
only be hoped that the stories and images from these
conflicts can in some way contribute to finding a way to
break these cycles. • |
|
|
|